HALE v. UNITED STATES et al
JAMES HALE |
UNITED STATES, JOHN DOES 1-10, JANE DOES 1-10 and ABC CORP. 1-10 |
3:2021cv16351 |
September 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Douglas E Arpert |
Freda L Wolfson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 LETTER ORDER that requested extension is granted; The initial conference will be converted to a telephone conference and is adjourned and rescheduled to 12/10/2021 at 10:00 A.M. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert on 10/22/2021. (abr, ) |
Set Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction . Motion set for 11/15/2021 before Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (abr, ) |
Reset Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction . Motion set for 11/15/2021 before Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (abr, ) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by UNITED STATES. Responses due by 11/1/2021 (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Declaration of Jennifer Valdivieso, #3 Text of Proposed Order, #4 Certificate of Service)(JUNEAU, ANGELA) |
Filing 5 Letter from the United States requesting an adjournment of the initial conference. (JUNEAU, ANGELA) |
Filing 4 Ordered the Initial Conference is set for 10/26/2021 at 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert, via telephone. Plaintiff is to set up and initiate the call to chambers (609-989-2144). Attention Counsel: The Joint Discovery Plan is due (7) days prior to the conference. Please email the Joint Discovery Plan to dea_orders@njd.uscourts.gov. (Attachment: JDP Instructions) Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert on 9/22/2021. (eh, ) |
Filing 3 Letter from the United States requesting additional time to answer, move or otherwise respond. (JUNEAU, ANGELA) |
Filing 2 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer. (JUNEAU, ANGELA) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by UNITED STATES from Superior Court of NJ, Somerset County, case number SOM-L-719-21., filed by UNITED STATES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Certificate of Service)(JUNEAU, ANGELA) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Many defendants were not added to the docket. When entering parties make sure to add ALL PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANTS as found on the state court complaint . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jjc, ) |
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jal, ) |
CLERKS TEXT ORDER - The Application for a Clerks Order Extending Time toAnswer - Document #2 submitted by UNITED STATES on 9/1/2021 has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 9/22/2021. (jal) |
Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert added. (jal, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.