HALFON v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
| ARLENE L HALFON |
| MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MCKESSON CORPORATION |
| 3:2021cv17059 |
| September 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Tonianne J Bongiovanni |
| Peter G Sheridan |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred from New Jersey has been opened in Eastern District of Pennsylvania as case 2:21-cv-20105, filed 10/13/2021. (km) |
Filing 3
Order of MDL Panel (CTO-84) transferring case to the USDC for the EDPA. (dm )
|
| Case electronically transferred to the USDC for the EDPA. (dm ) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to MCKESSON CORPORATION, MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jal, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MCKESSON CORPORATION, MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12808035) with JURY DEMAND, filed by ARLENE L HALFON. (Attachments: #1 Summons Merck Summons, #2 Summons MSD Summons, #3 Summons McKesson Summons)(CORDNER, MARGARET) |
| Judge Peter G. Sheridan and Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni added. (jal, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
