Duane Garfield v. Johnson and Johnson et al
Plaintiff: Duane Garfield
Defendant: JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
In Re: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Case Number: 3:2021cv17476
Filed: September 24, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Lois H Goodman
Referring Judge: Freda L Wolfson
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by SCOTT A. JAMES on behalf of JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC (JAMES, SCOTT)
September 27, 2021 Filing 14 Clerk's Notice to Counsel. (km)
September 24, 2021 Filing 13 Certified Copy of Transfer Order and docket received, Case transferred in from District of California Central; Case Number 2:21-cv-07049. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
September 24, 2021 Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman added. (mg, )
September 24, 2021 Member Case Direct File on 9/24/2021, for MDL 2738 Party JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION added. (mg, )
September 23, 2021 Filing 12 Conditional Transfer Order - 273 from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 2738, transferring case to USDC, District of New Jersey and assigned to Honorable Freda L. Wolfson. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (iv)
September 17, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Steve Kim to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:21-cv-07049 MWF(MAAx). (rn)
September 16, 2021 Filing 10 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendants Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Consumer, Inc.. (Weissenberger, Emily)
September 8, 2021 Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendants Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Consumer, Inc..(Weissenberger, Emily)
September 8, 2021 Filing 8 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (et)
September 2, 2021 Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Consumer, Inc., re Notice (Other) #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on 09/01/2021. (Weissenberger, Emily)
September 1, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Wendy R. Fleishman. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh)
September 1, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh)
September 1, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings filed by Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Weissenberger, Emily)
September 1, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., (Weissenberger, Emily)
September 1, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Weissenberger, Emily)
September 1, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior, case number 21STCV21595 Receipt No: ACACDC-31911118 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Johnson & Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Emily Weissenberger ISO Removal, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B) (Attorney Emily M Weissenberger added to party Johnson & Johnson(pty:dft), Attorney Emily M Weissenberger added to party Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.(pty:dft))(Weissenberger, Emily)
September 1, 2021 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Consumer, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Duane Garfield. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 6/9/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Duane Garfield v. Johnson and Johnson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Duane Garfield
Represented By: Sarah R London
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHNSON AND JOHNSON
Represented By: Amanda Villalobos
Represented By: Emily M Weissenberger
Represented By: Michael F Healy
Represented By: Michael Carl Zellers
Represented By: SCOTT A. JAMES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC
Represented By: Amanda Villalobos
Represented By: Emily M Weissenberger
Represented By: Michael F Healy
Represented By: Michael Carl Zellers
Represented By: SCOTT A. JAMES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?