MARX v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
KAY MARX |
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC |
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION |
3:2021cv18306 |
October 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Lois H Goodman |
Michael A Shipp |
Rukhsanah L Singh |
Freda L Wolfson |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Judge Michael A. Shipp and Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh added. Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman and Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson no longer assigned to case. (lm, ) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (mg, ) |
Member Case Direct File on 10/8/2021, for MDL 2738 Party JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION added. (mg, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12879509) with JURY DEMAND, filed by KAY MARX. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(RADOS, STEPHANIE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.