RUTLEDGE v. COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY et al
| TODD RUTLEDGE |
| COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY, ROBERT ANDERSON, JOHN DOES 1-10 and JANE DOES 1-10 (fictitious defendants whose names are presently unknown), JOHN DOES 1-10 and JANE DOES 1-10 |
| 3:2021cv18447 |
| October 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Lois H Goodman |
| Zahid N Quraishi |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL - The Fourth Count of Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with Prejudice, and the remaining claims contained in Plaintiff's Complaint are dismissed without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Zahid N. Quraishi on 11/16/2021. (jmh)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION of Dismissal by COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY. (SPATARO, AMBER) |
| Set Deadlines as to #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court. Motion set for 12/6/2021 before Judge Zahid N. Quraishi. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jmh) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Remand to State Court by TODD RUTLEDGE. (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Certification of Ayesha Hamilton, Esq., #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Text of Proposed Order, #10 Certificate of Service)(HAMILTON, AYESHA) |
|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER that in response to Plaintiff Todd Rutledge's letter #7 , the Court hereby grants leave for Plaintiff to file a Motion to Remand or to confer with Defendant and submit an appropriate consent order remanding this matter to Superior Court. So Ordered by Judge Zahid N. Quraishi on 10/21/2021. (kas)
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint And Separate Defenses by COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY.(SPATARO, AMBER) |
| Filing 7 Letter from Ayesha Hamilton, Esq. re #1 Notice of Removal,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(HAMILTON, AYESHA) |
|
Filing 6
Order Initial Conference set for 1/27/2022 03:00 PM in Trenton - Courtroom 7E before Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman on 10/14/2021. (ijf, )
|
| CLERKS TEXT ORDER - The Application for a Clerks Order Extending Time toAnswer - Document #3 submitted by COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY on 10/12/2021 has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 11/3/2021. (jal) |
| Judge Zahid N. Quraishi and Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman added. (jal) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by JONATHAN MICHAEL CARRILLO on behalf of COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY (CARRILLO, JONATHAN) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by AMBER M. SPATARO on behalf of COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY (SPATARO, AMBER) |
| Filing 3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Answer, Move or Otherwise Reply. Attorney AMBER M. SPATARO for COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY added. (SPATARO, AMBER) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY identifying NONE as Corporate Parent.. (SPATARO, AMBER) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY from Superior Court of NJ, Law Division, Mercer County, case number MER-L-1840-21. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12886279), filed by COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate of Service)(SPATARO, AMBER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
