JINDAL v. TANDON et al
| SANJAY JINDAL |
| DHEERAJ TANDON, AASHNA JINDAL and JOGMAZ INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION |
| 3:2021cv19014 |
| October 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Douglas E Arpert |
| Freda L Wolfson |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 12/14/2021. (jdb)
|
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by SANJAY JINDAL (KLAUSNER, NEAL) |
| Pro Hac Vice fee received as to Joshua H. Epstein $150, receipt number TRE123196 (jal) |
| Pro Hac Vice fee received as to Derick D. Dailey $150, receipt number TRE123195 (jal, ) |
| Filing 23 Corporate Disclosure Statement by JOGMAZ INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION. (SHEN, QIAN) |
| Filing 22 STIPULATION Concerning Briefing Schedule for Plaintiff's Motion (ECF No. 19) to be approved by the Court, by JOGMAZ INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, DHEERAJ TANDON. (SHEN, QIAN) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by QIAN SHEN on behalf of JOGMAZ INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (SHEN, QIAN) |
|
Filing 20
STIPULATION AND ORDER extending time, until 12/13/2021, for JOGMAZ INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION to respond to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert on 11/15/2021. (jdb)
|
| Filing 19 APPLICATION for Writ of for Prejudgment Attachment and Replevin by SANJAY JINDAL. (Attachments: #1 Prejudgment Writ of Attachment and Replevin, #2 [Proposed] Order of Prejudgment Writ of Attachment and Replevin, #3 Declaration of Sanjay Jindal Pursuant to L.R. Civ. P. 65.1)(KLAUSNER, NEAL) |
| Filing 18 STIPULATION Extending Time to Respond to the Complaint until Dec. 13, 2021, to be approved by the Court, by JOGMAZ INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION. (SHEN, QIAN) |
|
Filing 17
STIPULATION AND ORDER extending Mr. Tandon's time, until 12/13/2021, to answer, move or otherwise plead in response to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert on 11/8/2021. (jdb)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Respond to the Complaint until Dec. 13, 2021, to be approved by the Court, by DHEERAJ TANDON. (SHEN, QIAN) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Derick D. Dailey, Esq. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert on 11/2/2021. (jdb)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Joshua H. Epstein, Esq. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert on 11/02/2021. (jdb)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by QIAN SHEN on behalf of DHEERAJ TANDON (SHEN, QIAN) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by SANJAY JINDAL. AASHNA JINDAL served on 10/23/2021, answer due 11/15/2021. (KLAUSNER, NEAL) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by SANJAY JINDAL. DHEERAJ TANDON served on 10/23/2021, answer due 11/15/2021. (KLAUSNER, NEAL) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by SANJAY JINDAL. JOGMAZ INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION served on 10/20/2021, answer due 11/10/2021. (KLAUSNER, NEAL) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by SANJAY JINDAL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification of Derick D. Dailey, #2 Exhibit B - Proposed Order)(KLAUSNER, NEAL) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by SANJAY JINDAL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification of Joshua H. Epstein, #2 Exhibit B - Proposed Order)(KLAUSNER, NEAL) |
| Set Deadlines as to #9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice , #8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion set for 11/15/2021 before Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jem) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Joshua H. Epstein by SANJAY JINDAL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(KLAUSNER, NEAL) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Derick D. Dailey by SANJAY JINDAL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(KLAUSNER, NEAL) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to AASHNA JINDAL, JOGMAZ INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, DHEERAJ TANDON. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (mg, ) |
| Filing 4 Request for Summons to be Issued by SANJAY JINDAL as to JOGMAZ INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION. (KLAUSNER, NEAL) |
| Filing 3 Request for Summons to be Issued by SANJAY JINDAL as to DHEERAJ TANDON. (KLAUSNER, NEAL) |
| Filing 2 Request for Summons to be Issued by SANJAY JINDAL as to AASHNA JINDAL. (KLAUSNER, NEAL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AASHNA JINDAL, JOGMAZ INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, DHEERAJ TANDON ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12907652) with JURY DEMAND, filed by SANJAY JINDAL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(KLAUSNER, NEAL) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Applications for Pro Hac Vice Admission (ECF Nos. #6 & #7 ) filed by Neal Klausner on 10/19/2021 was submitted incorrectly as a motion. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE Applications for Pro Hac Vice Admission USING Civil Events - Other Filings - Other Documents - Application/Petition. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (jdb) |
| Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert added. (mg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
