BHANDARI v. UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
| TARUN BHANDARI, M.D., as the attorney-in-fact of his patient J.E. and M.D. TARUN BHANDARI |
| UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY, NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION and NOKIA MEDICAL EXPENSE PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES |
| 3:2021cv19611 |
| November 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Tonianne J Bongiovanni |
| Anne E Thompson |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by JOHN W. LEARDI on behalf of TARUN BHANDARI (LEARDI, JOHN) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to NOKIA MEDICAL EXPENSE PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES, NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION, UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jal, ) |
| Judge Anne E. Thompson and Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni added. (jal, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NOKIA MEDICAL EXPENSE PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES, NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION, UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12950656), filed by TARUN BHANDARI, M.D., as the attorney-in-fact of his patient J.E.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(WUKOVITS, FRANK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
