SALERNO v. TOWNSHIP et al
| RAYMOND SALERNO |
| BRICK TOWNSHIP, KYLE DUDAK, JAMES RICCIO, PATROLMAN KYLE DUDAK, JOHN DOES 1-5 and JOHN DOES 6-10 |
| 3:2022cv00417 |
| January 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Lois H Goodman |
| Freda L Wolfson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER that Defendants, Brick Township, Kyle Dudak, and James Riccio's time to Answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be extended to 4/04/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman on 3/08/2022. (jem)
|
| Filing 3 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer Complaint by KYLE DUDAK, JAMES RICCIO, BRICK TOWNSHIP. (RIORDAN, KEVIN) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to KYLE DUDAK, JAMES RICCIO, BRICK TOWNSHIP. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jal, ) |
| Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman added. (jal, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KYLE DUDAK, JAMES RICCIO ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13144041) with JURY DEMAND, filed by RAYMOND SALERNO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons request to issue)(MALLON, THOMAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
