VAMVAS v. CUCCINIELLO et al
| MICHAEL J. VAMVAS |
| DOMINICK CUCCINIELLO, MICHAEL SCHNIEDT, LESLEY KIRCHGESSNER, SOUTH TOMS RIVER, JACK SAYEGH, BOROUGH OF SOUTH TOMS RIVER and JOHN DOES 1-10 |
| 3:2022cv00571 |
| February 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Tonianne J Bongiovanni |
| Zahid N Quraishi |
| Rukhsanah L Singh |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 31
REPLY BRIEF to Opposition to Motion filed by BOROUGH OF SOUTH TOMS RIVER, JOHN DOES 1-10, LESLEY KIRCHGESSNER, JACK SAYEGH, MICHAEL SCHNIEDT, SOUTH TOMS RIVER re #28 First MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(KHATAMI, CHRISTOPHER)
|
|
Filing 30
RESPONSE in Opposition filed by MICHAEL J. VAMVAS re #28 First MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Attachments: #1 Certification)(HUIZENGA, RICHARD)
|
|
Filing 29
Exhibit to #28 Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by All Defendants. (KHATAMI, CHRISTOPHER)
|
|
Set Deadlines as to #28 First MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Motion set for 7/17/2023 before Judge Zahid N. Quraishi. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (mg)
|
|
Filing 28
First MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by All Defendants. Responses due by 7/3/2023. (Attachments: #1 Certification Certification of Counsel, #2 Certification Certification of Service, #3 Brief Memorandum of Law, #4 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(KHATAMI, CHRISTOPHER)
|
|
Filing 27
STIPULATION AND ORDER extending Defendant's time to respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint until 6/15/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh on 5/23/2023. (jdg)
|
|
Filing 26
STIPULATION Extending Time to File Answer by All Defendants. (KHATAMI, CHRISTOPHER)
|
|
Filing 25
AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs., filed by MICHAEL J. VAMVAS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A Vamvas Criminal Complaint)(HUIZENGA, RICHARD)
|
|
Filing 24
LETTER ORDER that Defendant's #10 MOTION to Dismiss is GRANTED; and it is Ordered that the #1 Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and it is further Ordered that Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days of this Order. Signed by Judge Zahid N. Quraishi on 3/30/2023. (jdg)
|
|
Filing 23
TEXT ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the parties' joint status letter dated 9/19/2022. The telephone conference scheduled for 10/3/2022 is adjourned without new date at this time. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh on 9/19/2022. (mm)
|
|
Filing 22
Letter re 21 Order,,, Set Hearings,,. (DASTI, CHRISTOPHER)
|
|
Filing 21
TEXT ORDER: Telephone Conference set for 7/20/2022, is hereby RESCHEDULED to 10/3/2022 at 11:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh. Kindly mark your calendars accordingly. The Court shall provide dial-in information for the conference at a later date. No later than three (3) business days prior to the telephone status conference, the parties shall submit a joint status letter to the Court via CM/ECF not to exceed three (3) pages, setting forth the status of discovery and identifying any issues ripe for discussion with the Court. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh on 7/14/2022. (mm)
|
|
Filing 20
Letter re 12 Order,,. (DASTI, CHRISTOPHER)
|
|
Filing 19
REPLY to Response to Motion filed by BOROUGH OF SOUTH TOMS RIVER, LESLEY KIRCHGESSNER, JACK SAYEGH, MICHAEL SCHNIEDT, SOUTH TOMS RIVER re #10 MOTION to Dismiss (DASTI, CHRISTOPHER)
|
|
Filing 18
BRIEF in Opposition filed by All Plaintiffs re #10 MOTION to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(HUIZENGA, RICHARD)
|
|
Filing 17
STIPULATION AND ORDER of voluntary dismissal without prejudice as to DOMINICK CUCCINIELLO. Signed by Judge Zahid N. Quraishi on 6/9/2022. (abr, )
|
|
Filing 16
TEXT ORDER that in light of the Court's review of the parties' pre-motion letters, and in accordance with the undersigned's judicial preferences, the Court hereby waives a pre-motion conference and REINSTATES Defendants' Motion to Dismiss #10 . Any opposition shall be filed by no later than 06/21/2022, any reply shall be filed by no later than 06/28/2022, and the Motion is to be made returnable 07/05/2022. The Clerks Office is hereby instructed to REINSTATE Defendants' Motion #10 . So Ordered by Judge Zahid N. Quraishi on 06/09/2022. (Gonzalez, P)
|
|
Filing 15
Letter re 11 Order on Oral Motion,, #14 Response to Motion. (DASTI, CHRISTOPHER)
|
|
Filing 14
RESPONSE to Motion filed by All Plaintiffs re #10 MOTION to Dismiss (HUIZENGA, RICHARD)
|
|
Filing 13
STIPULATION of Dismissal without prejudice by DOMINICK CUCCINIELLO. (THOMPSON, MATHEW)
|
|
Filing 12
TEXT ORDER: A status conference via telephone is set for 7/20/2022 at 11:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh. Kindly mark your calendars accordingly. The Court shall circulate dial-in information for the telephone conference at a later date. No later than three (3) business days prior to the telephone status conference, the parties shall submit a joint status letter to the Court via CM/ECF not to exceed three (3) pages, setting forth the status of discovery and identifying any issues ripe for discussion with the Court. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh on 6/2/2022. (mm)
|
|
Text Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh: Initial Pretrial Conference via zoom held on 6/2/2022. The Court held a Initial Scheduling Conference in this matter. Plaintiff raised that he may seek leave file a motion to disqualify counsel for the Borough of South Toms River Defendants. The parties are directed to meet and confer on the anticipated motion to disqualify counsel by way of letters or other written format. Specifically, Plaintiff is to serve on Defendants, but not file, its arguments as to any potential motion to disqualify counsel by no later than 6/10/2022. Defendants are to serve on Plaintiff, but not file, their response to the arguments raised by Plaintiff by no later than 6/21/2022. Plaintiff may serve a reply, if any, to Defendants by no later than 6/28/2022. Discovery is held in abeyance pending further discussion with counsel. (mm)
|
|
Filing 11
TEXT ORDER that in accordance with the undersigned's judicial preferences, the parties are hereby instructed to meet and confer with respect to Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings #10 . By no later than 06/06/2022 Plaintiff shall file a short letter response to Defendants' arguments. Pending the Court's review, the briefing on the Motion #10 is hereby STAYED and the Clerk's Office is instructed to ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE it. So Ordered by Judge Zahid N. Quraishi on 05/31/2022. (Gonzalez, P)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Dismiss by BOROUGH OF SOUTH TOMS RIVER, LESLEY KIRCHGESSNER, JACK SAYEGH, MICHAEL SCHNIEDT, SOUTH TOMS RIVER. Responses due by 6/7/2022 (Attachments: #1 Notice of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Brief, #3 Certification of Counsel with Exhibits, #4 Text of Proposed Order, #5 Certificate of Service)(DASTI, CHRISTOPHER)
|
|
Set Deadlines as to #10 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion set for 6/21/2022 before Judge Zahid N. Quraishi. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (abr, )
|
|
Filing 9
Proposed Order by BOROUGH OF SOUTH TOMS RIVER, LESLEY KIRCHGESSNER, JACK SAYEGH, MICHAEL SCHNIEDT, SOUTH TOMS RIVER re #5 Order, Set Hearings, Set/Clear Flags. (DASTI, CHRISTOPHER)
|
|
Filing 8
Letter from counsel for Borough Defendants certify service of initial dislcosures. (DASTI, CHRISTOPHER)
|
|
Filing 7
Letter from Mathew B. Thompson, Esq. re: initial disclosures. (THOMPSON, MATHEW)
|
|
Filing 6
Substitution of Attorney - Attorney CHRISTOPHER JOHN DASTI terminated. Attorney MATHEW BRADY THOMPSON for DOMINICK CUCCINIELLO added.. (THOMPSON, MATHEW)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for 6/2/2022 at 11:30 AM in Trenton - Courtroom 7W before Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh on 4/11/2022. (abr, )
|
|
Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh added. Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni no longer assigned to case. (jjc, )
|
|
Filing 4
Letter from counsel for Defendants re: plaintiff Rule 11 notice. (DASTI, CHRISTOPHER)
|
|
Filing 3
ANSWER to Complaint by BOROUGH OF SOUTH TOMS RIVER, DOMINICK CUCCINIELLO, LESLEY KIRCHGESSNER, JACK SAYEGH, MICHAEL SCHNIEDT, SOUTH TOMS RIVER.(DASTI, CHRISTOPHER)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS ISSUED as to BOROUGH OF SOUTH TOMS RIVER, DOMINICK CUCCINIELLO, LESLEY KIRCHGESSNER, JACK SAYEGH, MICHAEL SCHNIEDT, SOUTH TOMS RIVER. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jal)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against DOMINICK CUCCINIELLO, LESLEY KIRCHGESSNER, MICHAEL SCHNIEDT, SOUTH TOMS RIVER ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13164265) with JURY DEMAND, filed by MICHAEL J VAMVAS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(HUIZENGA, RICHARD)
|
|
Judge Zahid N. Quraishi and Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni added. (jal)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
