CALIX-ANTUNEZ v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
| MELVIN CALIX-ANTUNEZ |
| THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and ADMINISTRATOR, NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON |
| 3:2022cv01305 |
| March 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Zahid N Quraishi |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER that the Clerk's Office is directed to reopen this case. So Ordered by Judge Zahid N. Quraishi on 5/6/2022. (kas)
|
| Notice of #3 Signed Petition and Filing Fee Received was forwarded to ZNQ Chambers on 5/4/2022. (jmh) |
| Filing 3 SIGNED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Filing fee Received $ 5 receipt number TRE126224. (jal, ). Modified on 5/4/2022 (jmh). |
|
Filing 2
ORDER that the Clerk shall administratively terminate this matter; Petitioner may reopen this action by notifying the Court in writing within 30 days of the entry of this Order with a signed petition and either a properly completed in forma pauperis application or the $5 filing fee; Clerk shall serve this Order and a blank DNJ-Pro-Se-007-B(Rev. 09/09) by mail. Signed by Judge Zahid N. Quraishi on 3/21/2022. (mg)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by MELVIN CALIX-ANTUNEZ. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Cover letter, #3 Envelope, #4 Letter)(jal, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
