ABAJYAN v. GARLAND et al
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ANTONY BLINKEN, CONN SCHRADER, CARL C. RISCH, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, PAULO CORREIA, JOHN THOMPSON and PHILIP R SELLINGER |
| PETROS ABAJYAN |
| 3:2022cv02081 |
| April 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Michael A Shipp |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by MATTHEW JOSEPH MAILLOUX on behalf of All Defendants (MAILLOUX, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ANTONY BLINKEN, PAULO CORREIA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, CARL C. RISCH, CONN SCHRADER, PHILIP R SELLINGER, JOHN THOMPSON. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jdg, ) |
| Judge Michael A. Shipp added. (jdg, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANTONY BLINKEN, PAULO CORREIA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, CARL C. RISCH, CONN SCHRADER, PHILIP R SELLINGER, JOHN THOMPSON ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13324312), filed by PETROS ABAJYAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Index, #3 Exhibit visa bulletin, #4 Exhibit USCIS Processing Times, #5 Exhibit I-130 receipt notice, #6 Exhibit naturalization certificate, #7 Exhibit upgrade letter)(VOSBIKIAN, STEVEN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
