MCGINN v. XPO LOGISTICS, INC. et al
PATRICK MCGINN, XPO LOGISTICS, INC., ABC COMPANIES (1-5), fictitiously named businesses, JOHN DOES (1-5), fictitiously named individuals, ABC COMPANIES (1-5) and JOHN DOES (1-5) |
3:2022cv02531 |
April 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Rukhsanah L Singh |
Freda L Wolfson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Transmittal Letter for remanded case to Middlesex County Courthouse*56 Paterson StreetNew Brunswick, NJ 08903 State No: MID-L-000843-22. Mailed certified copy of the Order remanding case. (jdg) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION and ORDER granting #6 Motion to Remand to Middlesex County Superior Court. Signed by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 6/8/2022. (jdg) |
***Civil Case Terminated. (jdg) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion filed by XPO LOGISTICS, INC. re #6 First MOTION to Remand Middlesex County Letter & Stipulation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Stipulation)(CACCAMO-BOBCHIN, PETER) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion filed by XPO LOGISTICS, INC. re #6 First MOTION to Remand Middlesex County Letter (CACCAMO-BOBCHIN, PETER) |
Filing 8 LETTER ORDER adjourning initial conference without a new date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh on 5/26/2022. (abr, ) |
Filing 7 Letter from Paul R. Garelick, Esq.. (GARELICK, PAUL) |
Set Deadlines as to #6 First MOTION to Remand Middlesex County. Motion set for 6/21/2022 before Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (abr, ) |
Filing 6 First MOTION to Remand Middlesex County by PATRICK MCGINN. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Proposed Order)(GARELICK, PAUL) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - This message is in reference to the Certification #4 filed by Paul Garelick on 5/12/2022. Counsel is advised that they must file a formal motion if they are looking to have this case remanded to state court. Counsel should file a Notice of Motion to Remand and reference the certification as their supporting documentation. If a formal motion is not filed, the Court will not consider this request. (eaj) |
Filing 5 Letter from Paul R. Garelick, Esq.. (GARELICK, PAUL) |
Filing 4 Certification of Paul R. Garelick on behalf of PATRICK MCGINN. (GARELICK, PAUL) |
Filing 3 ORDER SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for 6/14/2022 at 11:00 AM in Trenton - Courtroom 7W before Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh on 5/2/2022. (abr, ) |
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jdg) |
Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh added. (jdg) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by XPO LOGISTICS, INC. identifying XPO Logistics, Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (CACCAMO-BOBCHIN, PETER) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by XPO LOGISTICS, INC. from Superior Court of Middlesex County, NJ, case number MID-L-000843-22. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13376763), filed by XPO LOGISTICS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex B - Removing Defendant's Answer, #3 Exhibit Ex C - Plaintiff's Statement of Damages, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(CACCAMO-BOBCHIN, PETER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.