CARPENTER v. TARGET
| LAKISHA CARPENTER |
| TARGET CORPORATION and TARGET |
| 3:2022cv03195 |
| May 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Douglas E Arpert |
| Freda L Wolfson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Transmittal Letter for remanded case to Middlesex County Courthouse*56 Paterson StreetNew Brunswick, NJ 08903 State No: MID-L-2073-22. Mailed certified copy of the Order remanding case. (jdg) |
Filing 4
CONSENT ORDER remanding this action to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County. Signed by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 6/28/2022. (jdg) (Main Document 4 replaced on 6/28/2022) (jdg, ).
|
| Filing 3 Proposed Order Consent Order Limiting Recovery of Damages by TARGET. (MCINTYRE, CHRISTOPHER) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (jdg) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TARGET . (MCINTYRE, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by TARGET from MIDDLESEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, case number MID-L-2073-22. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13442221), filed by TARGET CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MCINTYRE, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert added. (jdg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
