MELENDEZ v. LL FLOORING, INC. et al
| EDDY MELENDEZ |
| LL FLOORING, INC., LUMBER LIQUIDATORS INC, LL FLOORING DESIGNS and LESTER LOCKWOOD |
| 3:2022cv04507 |
| July 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Douglas E Arpert |
| Zahid N Quraishi |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL without prejudice. Signed by Judge Zahid N. Quraishi on 8/5/2022. (jal, )
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice by EDDY MELENDEZ (GRUNFELD, NICOLE) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to LL FLOORING, INC., LESTER LOCKWOOD. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (kht) |
| Judge Zahid N. Quraishi and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert added. (kht) |
| Filing 3 Request for Summons to be Issued by EDDY MELENDEZ as to LL FLOORING, INC.. (GRUNFELD, NICOLE) |
| Filing 2 Request for Summons to be Issued by EDDY MELENDEZ as to LESTER LOCKWOOD. (GRUNFELD, NICOLE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LL FLOORING, INC., LESTER LOCKWOOD ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13547420), filed by EDDY MELENDEZ. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(GRUNFELD, NICOLE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
