BANERJEE et al v. JADDOU
| ARIJIT BANERJEE and SHREEMANTI CHAKRABARTY |
| UR JADDOU |
| 3:2022cv04664 |
| July 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Lois H Goodman |
| Freda L Wolfson |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by ANGELA JUNEAU on behalf of UR JADDOU (JUNEAU, ANGELA)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS ISSUED as to UR JADDOU. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (kht)
|
|
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Complaint #1 submitted by Yelena Vilk on 7/20/2022 appears to have address information that does not match the court's records for this case. Please refer to the court's website at www.njd.uscourts.gov for information and instructions on maintaining your account. (kht)
|
|
Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman added. (kht)
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement by ARIJIT BANERJEE, SHREEMANTI CHAKRABARTY. (VILK, YELENA)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against UR JADDOU ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13573574), filed by ARIJIT BANERJEE, SHREEMANTI CHAKRABARTY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Proposed Summons, #3 Summons Proposed Summons, #4 Summons Proposed Summons)(VILK, YELENA)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
