KENNEDY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al
| JOHN KENNEDY |
| NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and NEW JERSEY UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE |
| 3:2022cv04909 |
| August 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Tonianne J Bongiovanni |
| Michael A Shipp |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER denying Plaintiff's IFP Application; The Clerk shall close this matter; By 10/27/2022 plaintiff may submit a new IFP application in the form attached to this Order, alternatively by 10/27/2022 Plaintiff may submit payment in the amount of $402 and the Clerk will reopen the case. (A copy of this Order and blank IFP Application was mailed to Plaintiff via regular mail on 9/28/2022) (kht) Modified on 9/28/2022 (jdg). Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 9/27/2022.
|
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (kht, ) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (jal, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Consent & Registration form to Receive Documents Electronically by JOHN KENNEDY (Filed via ECF Help Desk) (jal, ) |
| Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Application IFP, #3 Text of Proposed Order, #4 Exhibit) (Filed via ECF Help Desk) (jal, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
