ANDERSON v. GANNETT CO., INC.
| NICHOLE ANDERSON |
| GANNETT CO., INC. |
| 3:2022cv05088 |
| August 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Georgette Castner |
| Rukhsanah L Singh |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
CONSENT ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; The new filing deadline is 10/18/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh on 9/16/2022. (mg)
|
|
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please note the Order attached to docket entry #7 filed by the Clerk's office on 9/19/2022 was docketed with the incorrect document attached and in error. Please disregard. (mg)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; The new filing deadline is 10/18/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh on 9/16/2022. (jal, )
|
|
Set Deadlines as to #6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , Move, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Motion set for 10/3/2022 before Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jal, )
|
|
Filing 6
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , Move, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by GANNETT CO., INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(YOHAI, DAVID)
|
|
Filing 5
Corporate Disclosure Statement by GANNETT CO., INC.. (YOHAI, DAVID)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by DAVID L. YOHAI on behalf of GANNETT CO., INC. (YOHAI, DAVID)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS Returned Executed by NICHOLE ANDERSON. GANNETT CO., INC. served on 8/25/2022, answer due 9/15/2022. (EDELSBERG, RACHEL)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS ISSUED as to GANNETT CO., INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (kht)
|
|
Judge Georgette Castner and Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh added. (kht)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against GANNETT CO., INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13636086) with JURY DEMAND, filed by NICHOLE ANDERSON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(EDELSBERG, RACHEL)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ANDERSON v. GANNETT CO., INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: NICHOLE ANDERSON | |
| Represented By: | RACHEL NICOLE EDELSBERG |
| Represented By: | RACHEL NICOLE DAPEER |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GANNETT CO., INC. | |
| Represented By: | DAVID L. YOHAI |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
