MURACHANIAN et al v. BLINKEN et al
| JOHN MURACHANIAN and INGA YESAYAN |
| ANTONY BLINKEN, MERRICK GARLAND, UR M. JADDOU, DANIEL M. RENAUD, YA-MEI CHEN, JOHN THOMPSON and PHILIP SELLINGER |
| 3:2022cv05526 |
| September 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Michael A Shipp |
| Rukhsanah L Singh |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER of voluntary dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 10/20/2022. (jdg)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by JOHN MURACHANIAN, INGA YESAYAN (VOSBIKIAN, STEVEN) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ANTONY BLINKEN, YA-MEI CHEN, MERRICK GARLAND, UR M. JADDOU, DANIEL M. RENAUD, PHILIP SELLINGER, JOHN THOMPSON. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (kht) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANTONY BLINKEN, YA-MEI CHEN, MERRICK GARLAND, UR M. JADDOU, DANIEL M. RENAUD, PHILIP SELLINGER, JOHN THOMPSON ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13686683), filed by INGA YESAYAN, JOHN MURACHANIAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit)(VOSBIKIAN, STEVEN) |
| Judge Michael A. Shipp and Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh added. (kht) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
