AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY v. GLUCK PLUMBING et al
AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY |
GLUCK PLUMBING and UNLIMITED PURE WATER |
3:2022cv06824 |
November 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Douglas E Arpert |
Michael A Shipp |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL with prejudice. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 1/4/2023. (mg) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY (HUNT, ANDREW) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY identifying Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (HUNT, ANDREW) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY. UNLIMITED PURE WATER served on 12/5/2022, answer due 12/27/2022. (HUNT, ANDREW) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to GLUCK PLUMBING, UNLIMITED PURE WATER. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (mlh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GLUCK PLUMBING, UNLIMITED PURE WATER ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13856775) with JURY DEMAND, filed by AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY.(HUNT, ANDREW) |
Judge Michael A. Shipp and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert added. (mlh) |
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (mlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.