CITY OF WARWICK RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. CATALENT, INC. et al
| CITY OF WARWICK RETIREMENT SYSTEM |
| CATALENT, INC., JOHN CHIMINSKI, ALESSANDRO MASELLI and THOMAS CASTELLANO |
| 3:2023cv01108 |
| February 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Douglas E Arpert |
| Zahid N Quraishi |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to THOMAS CASTELLANO, CATALENT, INC., JOHN CHIMINSKI, and ALESSANDRO MASELLI. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (mlh) |
| Judge Zahid N. Quraishi and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert added. (mlh) |
| Filing 3 Certification on behalf of CITY OF WARWICK RETIREMENT SYSTEM Re #1 Complaint,. (COTILLETTA, JOSEPH) |
| Filing 2 Request for Summons to be Issued by CITY OF WARWICK RETIREMENT SYSTEM as to THOMAS CASTELLANO, CATALENT, INC., JOHN CHIMINSKI, ALESSANDRO MASELLI. (COTILLETTA, JOSEPH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against THOMAS CASTELLANO, CATALENT, INC., JOHN CHIMINSKI, ALESSANDRO MASELLI ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14095603) with JURY DEMAND, filed by CITY OF WARWICK RETIREMENT SYSTEM. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(COTILLETTA, JOSEPH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
