MAYER v. BURGER et al
| CARL J. MAYER |
| JACQUELINE BURGER, DANIEL P. MAYER and FRANK M. GLASER |
| 3:2023cv02272 |
| April 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Georgette Castner |
| J Brendan Day |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Defendants' pre-motion letters seeking a conference to discuss their anticipated motions to dismiss. (ECF Nos. #7 & #8 .) Pursuant to this Court's individual rules, Plaintiff was expected to file a responsive letter by May 30, 2023. No such letter was received. Defendants may proceed to file their anticipated motions, which shall be due by June 26, 2023. The schedule for further briefing on the motions shall be in accordance with the applicable rules. So Ordered by Judge Georgette Castner on 6/2/23. (adi)
|
|
Filing 8
Letter from Diana R. Brocco. (BROCCO, DIANA)
|
|
Filing 7
Letter from Thomas J. Cafferty, Esq.. (CAFFERTY, THOMAS)
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT ORDER extending Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint until 6/7/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Brendan Day on 5/8/2023. (jdg)
|
|
Filing 5
Letter from Defendant Requesting Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Consent Order Extending Deadline for Defendants to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint)(CAFFERTY, THOMAS)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by THOMAS JOSEPH CAFFERTY on behalf of DANIEL P. MAYER (CAFFERTY, THOMAS)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by MICHAEL WILLIAM SABO on behalf of CARL J. MAYER (SABO, MICHAEL)
|
|
Filing 2
Diversity Disclosure Statement by JACQUELINE BURGER, FRANK M. GLASER. (BROCCO, DIANA)
|
|
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party Information is to be entered in CAPITAL LETTERS . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jjc, )
|
|
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, a disclosure statement is required to be filed by parties and intervenors in diversity actions to identify the citizenship of every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party or intervenor. Such disclosure statements must be filed with the parties, intervenors or proposed intervenors first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response or other request addressed to the Court. (kht)
|
|
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed did not include a Civil Cover Sheet (JS-44), which is required to be submitted along with the initial pleading, as indicated in the Attorney Case Opening Guide. Please complete and file a #Civil Cover Sheet using the event Exhibit (to Document) found under Civil/Other Filings/Other Documents. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (dmw, )
|
|
Judge Georgette Castner and Magistrate Judge J. Brendan Day added. (kht)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Jacqueline Burger, Frank M Glaser from Mercer, case number L-623-23. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14268097), filed by Jacqueline Burger, Frank M Glaser. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(BROCCO, DIANA)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
