JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. v. SPEECH & LANGUAGE CENTER, LLC et al
| JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. |
| SPEECH & LANGUAGE CENTER, LLC and CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS |
| 3:2023cv02844 |
| May 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Michael A Shipp |
| Rukhsanah L Singh |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (BOYD, BARBARA) |
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER: This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant Chryssoula Arsenis's ("Defendant") letter correspondence requesting a 30-day extension to oppose Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.'s ("Chase") Motion to Remand, pursuant to the Court's Text Order (ECF No. 7 ). (ECF No. #9 .) The Court will grant a two-week extension. Defendant may file opposition by July 24, 2023. Because Defendant does not receive electronic notice of filings, Chase must properly serve this Text Order on Defendant by Friday, July 10, 2023, and e-file proof of service. So Ordered by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 7/7/2023. *NM*(jdb)
|
| Filing 9 Letter to Judge Shipp requesting 30 day extension of time to respond to 6/26/2023 Text Order from CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS. (Received via Help Desk) (mlh) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (BOYD, BARBARA) |
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER: This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s ("Chase") letter correspondence. (ECF No. #5 .) The Court construes the letter as Chase's request to remand. The Court construes Chase as relying on arguments presented in its prior Motion to Remand, which Chase attaches to its letter correspondence. (ECF No. #5 -2.) Defendant Chryssoula Arsenis ("Defendant") may file opposition by July 10, 2023. Because Defendant does not receive electronic notice of filings, Chase must properly serve this Text Order on Defendant by Wednesday, June 28, 2023, and e-file proof of service. So Ordered by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 6/26/2023. (jdb)
|
| Filing 6 Resolutions of SPEECH & LANGUAGE CENTER, LLC by CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS (Received via Help Desk)(kht) |
| Filing 5 Letter from Barbara J. Boyd, Esquire re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Notice of Guidelines for Pro Se Filers, Filing Fee Received, #3 Letter: Filing Fee or IFP due, #4 Exhibit (to Document), QC - Lack of Disclosure Statement,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Court Opinion 11.28.22, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's Brief filed 5.13.22)(BOYD, BARBARA) Modified on 7/11/2023 (jdb). |
| Filing fee: $402.00, receipt number NEW48497. (ps) |
| Filing 4 Exhibit to #1 Notice of Removal. Supplemental Documentation by CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Case Jacket 1, #2 Civil Case Jacket 2, #3 Exhibit)(Received via Help Desk)(kht) |
| Filing 3 Clerk's Letter: Complaint not accompanied by the filing fee or application to proceed in forma pauperis. (jdg) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (jdg) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, a disclosure statement is required to be filed by a nongovernmental corporate party or intervenor. Please refer to the Court's website at #www.njd.uscourts.gov for a form and filing instructions. (jdg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS from SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, MERCER COUNTY, case number MER L 000035 16, filed by CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(jdg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
