WEXLER v. EAST WINDSOR REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
| STUART WEXLER |
| EAST WINDSOR REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, MARK DANIELS, DENNIS VINSON, PAUL TODD and ERIN SERVILLO |
| 3:2023cv02952 |
| May 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| J Brendan Day |
| Robert Kirsch |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Defendants East Windsor Regional School District, Mark Daniels, Dennis Vinson, Paul Todd and Erin Servillo's ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by All Defendants.(SEVER, DIANA) |
| Filing 10 PROPOSED AMENDED COMPLAINT against MARK DANIELS, EAST WINDSOR REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ERIN SERVILLO, PAUL TODD, DENNIS VINSON, filed by STUART WEXLER. (Filed via ECF HelpDesk)(mg) |
| Filing 9 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendants East Windsor Regional School District, Mark Daniels, Dennis Vinson, Paul Todd and Erin Servillo.. (SEVER, DIANA) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The #8 Application for Clerk's Extension filed by DIANA SEVER ON 7/6/2023 was submitted incorrectly as a Motion. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE Application USING Application for Clerk Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order. The calendar event created by the motion has been terminated by the Clerk's Office. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (mg) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #9 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by ERIN SERVILLO, DENNIS VINSON, MARK DANIELS, EAST WINDSOR REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, PAUL TODD has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 7/20/2023. (mg) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by All Defendants. (SEVER, DIANA) |
| Filing 7 PROPOSED AMENDED COMPLAINT against MARK DANIELS, EAST WINDSOR REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ERIN SERVILLO, PAUL TODD, and DENNIS VINSON filed by STUART WEXLER. (Received via Help Desk)(mlh) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The "PROPOSED AMENDED COMPLAINT" #7 submitted by STUART WEXLER on 6/29/2023 was not signed. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE DOCUMENT WITH THE PROPER SIGNATURE. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (mlh) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by STUART WEXLER. (Received via Help Desk) MARK DANIELS, ERIN SERVILLO, PAUL TODD, and DENNIS VINSON served on 6/15/2023, answer due 7/6/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service-Erin Servillo, #2 Proof of Service-Mark Daniels, #3 Proof of Service-Paul Todd)(mlh) |
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to STUART WEXLER. (mlh) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to MARK DANIELS, EAST WINDSOR REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ERIN SERVILLO, PAUL TODD, DENNIS VINSON. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jal, ) |
| Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number TRE132858 (jal, ) |
| COMPLAINT filed. See docket entry #1 for the complaint. (jal) Modified on 6/7/2023 (km). |
| Filing 3 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (kht) |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Letter: Complaint not accompanied by the filing fee or application to proceed in forma pauperis. (kht) |
| Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Received via Help Desk)(kht) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
