LANGAN v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION et al
DANIELLE LANGAN |
STARBUCKS CORPORATION doing business as STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY |
3:2023cv05056 |
August 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Douglas E Arpert |
Zahid N Quraishi |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 LETTER ORDER granting request for a 30 day extension of time to respond to the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert on 10/5/2023. (jal, ) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by CARMEN J. DIMARIA on behalf of STARBUCKS CORPORATION (DIMARIA, CARMEN) |
Filing 8 Letter from Jocelyn A. Merced, Esq. requesting an extension of time to file Answer re #1 Complaint,. (MERCED, JOCELYN) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by JOCELYN ANNISE MERCED on behalf of STARBUCKS CORPORATION (MERCED, JOCELYN) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by DANIELLE LANGAN. STARBUCKS CORPORATION waiver sent on 8/22/2023, answer due 10/23/2023. (MILETTI, VINCENT) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to STARBUCKS CORPORATION. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jjc, ) |
Filing 4 Exhibit to #1 Complaint, CIVIL COVER SHEET by Danielle Langan. (MILETTI, VINCENT) |
Filing 3 Request for Summons to be Issued by Danielle Langan as to STARBUCKS COFFEE CORPORATION, STARBUCKS CORPORATION. (MILETTI, VINCENT) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to MICHAEL KESSEL, ESQ. LITTLER MENDELSEN, FOR STARBUCKS on 08/18/2023 by Danielle Langan. Waiver of Service due by 9/18/2023. (MILETTI, VINCENT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against STARBUCKS COFFEE CORPORATION, STARBUCKS CORPORATION ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14540664) with JURY DEMAND, filed by Danielle Langan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit New Jersey Office of Attorney General & EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit EEOC Notice of Right To Sue)(MILETTI, VINCENT) |
Judge Zahid N. Quraishi and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert added. (jjc, ) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: D/B/A parties should be added as an ALIAS. Party Information is to be entered in CAPITAL LETTERS . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jjc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: LANGAN v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DANIELLE LANGAN | |
Represented By: | VINCENT MILETTI |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: STARBUCKS CORPORATION doing business as STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY | |
Represented By: | CARMEN J. DIMARIA |
Represented By: | JOCELYN ANNISE MERCED |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.