POMASKI v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION et al
Plaintiff: JASON POMASKI
Defendant: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, MICHAEL INDENBOM, CHADD TATE, JOHN NGUYEN, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-5 and JOHN DOES 1-5
Case Number: 3:2023cv10764
Filed: August 25, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: J Brendan Day
Referring Judge: Zahid N Quraishi
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 STIPULATION AND ORDER that all discovery in this action, and Defendants' deadline to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint, are stayed until 2/23/2024. Signed by Judge Zahid N. Quraishi on 10/10/2023. (jdg)
October 9, 2023 Filing 11 STIPULATION Joint Stipulation Staying Discovery and Motion Proceedings Pending Mediation (Request to so Order) by MICHAEL INDENBOM, MICROSOFT CORPORATION, JOHN NGUYEN, CHADD TATE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order on Stipulation Staying Discovery and Motion Proceedings Pending Mediation (Request to so Order))(CALO, DENA)
September 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 TEXT ORDER that the Court has reviewed the parties' letters #8 and #9 , and hereby WAIVES the pre-motion conference. Defendant shall file its Motion to Dismiss, limited to the arguments in its pre-motion letter, by no later than 10/13/2023, to be made returnable 11/06/2023. So Ordered by Judge Zahid N. Quraishi on 9/22/2023. (kas)
September 19, 2023 Filing 9 Letter. (VALENZANO, PETER)
September 15, 2023 Filing 8 Letter from Dena Calo. (CALO, DENA)
August 30, 2023 Clerk`s Text Order - The document #6 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order, submitted by CHADD TATE, MICHAEL INDENBOM, MICROSOFT CORPORATION, and JOHN NGUYEN has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 9/15/2023. (mlh)
August 29, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by JEFFERY RANKEL on behalf of All Plaintiffs (RANKEL, JEFFERY)
August 29, 2023 Filing 6 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Plaintiff's Complaint. Attorney DENA B. CALO for MICHAEL INDENBOM,DENA B. CALO for MICROSOFT CORPORATION,DENA B. CALO for JOHN NGUYEN,DENA B. CALO for CHADD TATE added. (CALO, DENA)
August 25, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by ERIK P. PRAMSCHUFER on behalf of MICHAEL INDENBOM, MICROSOFT CORPORATION, JOHN NGUYEN, CHADD TATE (PRAMSCHUFER, ERIK)
August 25, 2023 Filing 4 Diversity Disclosure Statement by MICHAEL INDENBOM, MICROSOFT CORPORATION, JOHN NGUYEN, CHADD TATE. (CALO, DENA)
August 25, 2023 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MICROSOFT CORPORATION. (CALO, DENA)
August 25, 2023 Filing 2 Exhibit to #1 Notice of Removal,, Civil Coversheet by MICHAEL INDENBOM, MICROSOFT CORPORATION, JOHN NGUYEN, CHADD TATE. (CALO, DENA)
August 25, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CHADD TATE, MICHAEL INDENBOM, MICROSOFT CORPORATION, JOHN NGUYEN from Superior Court of New Jersey, Monmouth County, case number MON-L-002293-23. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14586488), filed by CHADD TATE, MICHAEL INDENBOM, MICROSOFT CORPORATION, JOHN NGUYEN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit "A" - Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit "B" State Court's Track Assignment, #3 Exhibit Exhibit "C" Acknowledgment of Service, #4 Exhibit Exhibit "D" Collemis Notice of Appearance)(CALO, DENA)
August 25, 2023 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed did not include a Civil Cover Sheet (JS-44), which is required to be submitted along with the initial pleading, as indicated in the Attorney Case Opening Guide. Please complete and file a #Civil Cover Sheet using the event Exhibit (to Document) found under Civil/Other Filings/Other Documents. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jjc, )
August 25, 2023 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, a disclosure statement is required to be filed by a nongovernmental corporate party or intervenor. Please refer to the Court's website at #www.njd.uscourts.gov for a form and filing instructions. (jjc, )
August 25, 2023 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2), unless the Court orders otherwise, in any action filed or removed to this Court, in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a), a party or intervenor must file a disclosure statement naming and identifying the citizenship of every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party or intervenor. A party, intervenor or proposed intervenor must file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court. #Click here to complete the Diversity Disclosure Statement, once complete, file it using the event Diversity Disclosure Statement. (jjc, )
August 25, 2023 Judge Zahid N. Quraishi and Magistrate Judge J. Brendan Day added. (jjc, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: POMASKI v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JASON POMASKI
Represented By: PETER D. VALENZANO
Represented By: JEFFERY RANKEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Represented By: ERIK P. PRAMSCHUFER
Represented By: DENA B. CALO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL INDENBOM
Represented By: ERIK P. PRAMSCHUFER
Represented By: DENA B. CALO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHADD TATE
Represented By: ERIK P. PRAMSCHUFER
Represented By: DENA B. CALO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN NGUYEN
Represented By: ERIK P. PRAMSCHUFER
Represented By: DENA B. CALO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ABC CORPORATIONS 1-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?