MARRONE v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al
| STEPHANIE MARRONE |
| MONSANTO COMPANY and JOHN DOES 1-50 |
| 3:2023cv20361 |
| September 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| J Brendan Day |
| Michael A Shipp |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred from New Jersey has been opened in California Northern District as case 3:23-cv-05070, filed 10/03/2023. (jjc, ) |
Filing 4
Order of MDL Panel (CTO-422) transferring case to the Northern District of California. (jjc, )
|
| Case electronically transferred to the USDC for the Northern District of California. (jjc, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by STEPHANIE MARRONE. MONSANTO COMPANY served on 9/21/2023, answer due 10/12/2023. (KIZIS, LYNNE) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to MONSANTO COMPANY. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jjc, ) |
| Judge Michael A. Shipp and Magistrate Judge J. Brendan Day added. (jjc, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN DOES 1-50, MONSANTO COMPANY ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14689430) with JURY DEMAND, filed by STEPHANIE MARRONE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(KIZIS, LYNNE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
