WARD et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC
JOHN JEFFREY WARD, RUTA TAITO and KAREN SCHWARTZ |
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, KENVUE, INC. and MCNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE |
3:2023cv20818 |
September 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Michael A Shipp |
Rukhsanah L Singh |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 STIPULATION AND ORDER substituting party names, amending the caption, and staying proceedings pending MDL determination. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 10/26/2023. (jdg) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, when entering a first appearance in a case, counsel should add their name when prompted. The Clerks office has added JEFFREY A.N. KOPCZYNSKI as representing JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC in this case. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. This message is for informational purposes only. (mlh) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION / Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order to Substitute Party Names, Amend Caption, and to Stay Proceedings Pending MDL Determination by JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. (KOPCZYNSKI, JEFFREY) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by RUTA TAITO, KAREN SCHWARTZ, JOHN JEFFREY WARD. MCNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE served on 10/5/2023, answer due 10/26/2023. (CARROLL, KATRINA) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by RUTA TAITO, KAREN SCHWARTZ, JOHN JEFFREY WARD. JOHNSON & JOHNSON served on 10/5/2023, answer due 10/26/2023. (CARROLL, KATRINA) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by RUTA TAITO, KAREN SCHWARTZ, JOHN JEFFREY WARD. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC served on 10/5/2023, answer due 10/26/2023. (CARROLL, KATRINA) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by RUTA TAITO, KAREN SCHWARTZ, JOHN JEFFREY WARD. KENVUE, INC. served on 10/5/2023, answer due 10/26/2023. (CARROLL, KATRINA) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, KENVUE, INC., MCNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jjc, ) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2), unless the Court orders otherwise, in any action filed or removed to this Court, in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a), a party or intervenor must file a disclosure statement naming and identifying the citizenship of every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party or intervenor. A party, intervenor or proposed intervenor must file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court. #Click here to complete the Diversity Disclosure Statement, once complete, file it using the event Diversity Disclosure Statement. (jjc, ) |
Judge Michael A. Shipp and Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh added. (jjc, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, KENVUE, INC., MCNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14750345) with JURY DEMAND, filed by RUTA TAITO, KAREN SCHWARTZ, JOHN JEFFREY WARD. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Exhibit A, #7 Exhibit B, #8 Exhibit C, #9 Exhibit D, #10 Exhibit E)(CARROLL, KATRINA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.