MALHOTRA v. JANAKIRAM
| MONA MALHOTRA |
| BHAVANA ATTI JANAKIRAM, BHAVANA JANAKIRAM and BHUVANESHWARI JANAKIRAM |
| 3:2023cv21599 |
| October 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Georgette Castner |
| J Brendan Day |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
TEXT ORDER: The Court is in receipt of defendant's 11/20/23 letter (Dkt. #9 ) requesting a 30-day extension to respond to the complaint, and plaintiff's 11/25/23 letter opposing the request (Dkt. #10 ). The Court having reviewed the complaint and finding that no prejudice will result, defendant's request is granted. Defendant shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before 1/5/2024. No further extensions to this deadline will be granted. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge J. Brendan Day on 11/29/2023. (cry)
|
| Filing 11 Disclosure Statement by MONA MALHOTRA. (Filed via ECF Help Desk) (jdg) |
| Filing 10 Letter regarding Defendant's request for an extension of time to file from MONA MALHOTRA. (Filed via ECF Help Desk) (jdg) |
| Filing 9 Letter from I. Michael Kessel to Judge Day requesting 30 day extension. (KESSEL, I.) |
| Filing 8 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Answer, Move or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint.. (KESSEL, I.) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by I. MICHAEL KESSEL on behalf of BHAVANA ATTI JANAKIRAM (KESSEL, I.) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The #8 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by BHAVANA ATTI JANAKIRAM has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 12/6/2023. (amv) |
| Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE by MONA MALHOTRA. (Filed via ECF Help Desk) (jdg) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to BHAVANA ATTI JANAKIRAM. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jjc, ) |
| Filing 4 Clerk's Letter: Complaint not accompanied by the filing fee or application to proceed in forma pauperis. (jal, ) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (jal, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Consent and Registration form to Receive Documents Electronically by MONA MALHOTRA. (jal, ) |
| Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 285 FORMS)(jal, ) |
| Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (jal, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2), unless the Court orders otherwise, in any action filed or removed to this Court, in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a), a party or intervenor must file a disclosure statement naming and identifying the citizenship of every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party or intervenor. A party, intervenor or proposed intervenor must file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court. #Click here to complete the Diversity Disclosure Statement, once complete, file it using the event Diversity Disclosure Statement. (jal, ) |
| COMPLAINT filed. See docket entry #1 for documents.(jjc, ) |
| Filing fee: $402.00, receipt number NEW49189. (ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
