MERCADO v. UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC. et al
| JERRY MERCADO |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC., UNITED HEALTHCARE and OPTUM SERVICES, INC. doing business as OPTUM |
| 3:2023cv22686 |
| November 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Michael A Shipp |
| Rukhsanah L Singh |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by JERRY MERCADO. UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC. waiver sent on 12/6/2023, answer due 2/5/2024. (OELTJEN, KATHERINE) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by JERRY MERCADO. UNITED HEALTHCARE waiver sent on 12/6/2023, answer due 2/5/2024. (OELTJEN, KATHERINE) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by JERRY MERCADO. OPTUM SERVICES, INC. waiver sent on 12/6/2023, answer due 2/5/2024. (OELTJEN, KATHERINE) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to OPTUM SERVICES, INC., UNITED HEALTHCARE, UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (kht) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against OPTUM SERVICES, INC., UNITED HEALTHCARE, UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14899760) with JURY DEMAND, filed by JERRY MERCADO.(OELTJEN, KATHERINE) |
| Judge Michael A. Shipp and Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh added. (kht) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
