BALAZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
| DOROTHY BALAZ |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, KENVUE, INC. and Janssen Pharamaceuticals, Inc. |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION |
| 3:2024cv00034 |
| January 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Michael A Shipp |
| Rukhsanah L Singh |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to JANSSEN PHARAMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC, KENVUE, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT LLC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jjc, ) |
| Judge Michael A. Shipp and Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh added. (jjc, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The COMPLAINT was uploaded prior to being flattened. Before uploading fillable forms to ECF you must flatten the file to prevent other users from manipulating or editing the information. The easiest way to flatten a PDF form is by selecting Print to PDF and saving the flattened form, other PDF software may differ. Please visit our #website under Flattening PDF Forms for guidance. Please email a flattened version to ecfhelp@njd.uscourts.gov for replacement on the docket. (jjc, ) |
| Member Case Direct File on 1/4/2024, for MDL 2738. (jjc, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC, Janssen Pharamaceuticals, Inc., KENVUE, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT LLC ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-14985562) with JURY DEMAND, filed by DOROTHY BALAZ. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MILLER, JAY) (Main Document 1 replaced on 1/5/2024) (jjc, ). |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party Information is to be entered in CAPITAL LETTERS DO NOT select a party if it is not in CAPITAL LETTERS or if it does not reflect the EXACT name as is found in the pleading, Create a new party. . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jjc, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: The Cause of Action is 28:1332 Diversity Product Liability, The Origin is 8(Multidistrict Litigation - Direct Filed) and the JPML# is 2738. Please keep this information for your records. This is the standard case data for directly filing complaints in MDL 2738 . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jjc, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: This case has not been associated with MDL 2738. Please remember to enter the JPML 2738 when opening cases related to MDL 2738 . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jjc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
