DOE v. ORACLE SCREENING SERVICES, INC.
| JOHN DOE |
| ORACLE SCREENING SERVICES, INC. |
| 3:2024cv01112 |
| February 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Robert Kirsch |
| Rukhsanah L Singh |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
Order Administratively Terminating Action - 60 Day, Pending Consummation of Settlement. Administrative Termination deadline set for 6/24/2024. Signed by Judge Robert Kirsch on 04/23/2024. (pdm)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Settlement as to Oracle Screening Services, Inc. by JOHN DOE (EIDELMAN, LEVI) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER Adjourning Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed under Pseudosynonym by one (1) motion cycle to May 6, 2024; Extending Defendant's time to respond to the Complaint to May 3, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh on 4/16/2024. (amv)
|
| Reset Deadlines as to #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Under Pseudonym . Motion set for 5/6/2024 before Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (amv) |
| Filing 13 Letter from Matthew Green. (GREEN, MATTHEW) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER extending Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint until 4/19/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh on 4/2/2024. (jdg)
|
| Filing 11 Letter from Matthew Green. (GREEN, MATTHEW) |
|
Filing 10
LETTER ORDER granting request for a 1 motion cycle adjournment of #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Under Pseudonym; The motion will be reset for 4/15/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh on 3/21/2024. (jal, )
|
| Filing 9 Letter from Matthew Green. (GREEN, MATTHEW) |
| Reset Deadlines as to #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Under Pseudonym . Motion set for 4/15/2024 before Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jal, ) |
| Filing 8 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer. (GREEN, MATTHEW) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The #5 "Application for Clerk Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order" filed by "MATT GREEN" on 3/14/2024 was submitted incorrectly as a "LETTER". This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. This message is for informational purposes only. (mlh) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #8 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by ORACLE SCREENING SERVICES, INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 4/4/2024. (mlh) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ORACLE SCREENING SERVICES, INC.. (GREEN, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by MATTHEW ADAM GREEN on behalf of ORACLE SCREENING SERVICES, INC. (GREEN, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 5 Letter from Matthew A. Green. (GREEN, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JOHN DOE. ORACLE SCREENING SERVICES, INC. served on 2/29/2024, answer due 3/21/2024. (EIDELMAN, LEVI) |
| Set Deadlines as to #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Under Pseudonym . Motion set for 4/1/2024 before Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (amv) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Under Pseudonym by JOHN DOE. (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(EIDELMAN, LEVI) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ORACLE SCREENING SERVICES, INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jal, ) |
| Judge Robert Kirsch and Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh added. (jal, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ORACLE SCREENING SERVICES, INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15119576) with JURY DEMAND, filed by JOHN DOE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(EIDELMAN, LEVI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DOE v. ORACLE SCREENING SERVICES, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JOHN DOE | |
| Represented By: | LEVI Y. EIDELMAN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ORACLE SCREENING SERVICES, INC. | |
| Represented By: | MATTHEW ADAM GREEN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
