ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION et al v. DATA AXLE, INC. et al
| ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, AS ASSIGNEE OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE COVERED PERSONS, JANE DOE-1, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, JANE DOE-2, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, EDWIN MALDONADO, SCOTT MALONEY, JUSTYNA MALONEY, PATRICK COLLIGAN and WILLIAM SULLIVAN |
| Data Axle, Inc., RICHARD ROES 1-10, FICTITIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS and ABC COMPANIES 1-10, FICTICIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN ENTITIES |
| 3:2024cv04181 |
| March 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Non-Motor Vehicle |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Diversity Disclosure Statement by Data Axle, Inc.. (DUFFY, JULIA) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Data Axle, Inc. identifying Court Square Capital Partners III, LP and Court Square Capital Partners (Offshore) III, LP as Corporate Parent.. (DUFFY, JULIA) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Data Axle, Inc. from Superior Court of Monmouth County, case number MON L 483 24. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15211146), filed by Data Axle, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(DUFFY, JULIA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
