INTRA-CELLULAR THERAPIES, INC. v. DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES, INC. et al
INTRA-CELLULAR THERAPIES, INC. |
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES, INC. and DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LTD. |
3:2024cv04314 |
March 28, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
J Brendan Day |
Michael A Shipp |
Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) |
35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 AO120 Patent Form filed. (jal, ) |
Filing 6 AO120 Patent Form filed. (jal, ) |
Filing 5 AO120 Patent Form filed. (jal, ) |
Filing 4 AO120 Patent Form filed. (jal, ) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LTD., DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES, INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jal, ) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by INTRA-CELLULAR THERAPIES, INC.. (WALSH, LIZA) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LTD., DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES, INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15224971) , Related Case Selected, filed by INTRA-CELLULAR THERAPIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A - P, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 AO120 - Part 1, #4 AO120 - Part 2, #5 AO120 - Part 3, #6 AO120 - Part 4)(WALSH, LIZA) |
Judge Michael A. Shipp and Magistrate Judge J. Brendan Day added. (jal, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.