EATO v. WEL COMPANIES, INC. et al
| KARA EATO |
| WEL COMPANIES, INC., AMBROSE BANFIELD, ABC CORPORATION THROUGH XYZ CORPORATION and JOHN DOE I THRU JOHN DOE X |
| 3:2024cv04569 |
| April 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by WEL COMPANIES, INC.. (SCHIPSKE, TIMOTHY) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by TIMOTHY J. SCHIPSKE on behalf of AMBROSE BANFIELD, WEL COMPANIES, INC. (SCHIPSKE, TIMOTHY) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by WEL Companies, Inc., Ambrose Banfield from Superior Court of New Jersey, case number MID-L-7117-23. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15252658), filed by WEL Companies, Inc., Ambrose Banfield. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A & B, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(SEGAL, JEFFREY) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party Information, Parties should be entered in ALL CAPS. The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (eaj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
