SHAMS et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
Plaintiff: AKHTAR NADHMAN SHAMS, MARIA NADHMAN SHAMS and Y. D. S.
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. EMBASSY IN ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN, ANTONY BLINKEN and DONALD BLOME
Case Number: 3:2024cv04828
Filed: April 11, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 11, 2024 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Y. D. S., AKHTAR NADHMAN SHAMS, MARIA NADHMAN SHAMS. (NESEVICH, RUSS)
April 11, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANTONY BLINKEN, DONALD BLOME, U.S. EMBASSY IN ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15274430), filed by AKHTAR NADHMAN SHAMS, Y. D. S., MARIA NADHMAN SHAMS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons Ambassador, #3 Summons Summons Attorney General, #4 Summons Summons Antony Blinken, #5 Summons Summons DOS, #6 Summons Summons Embassy, #7 Summons Summons U.S. Attorney)(NESEVICH, RUSS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SHAMS et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AKHTAR NADHMAN SHAMS
Represented By: RUSS NESEVICH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARIA NADHMAN SHAMS
Represented By: RUSS NESEVICH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Y. D. S.
Represented By: RUSS NESEVICH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. EMBASSY IN ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANTONY BLINKEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DONALD BLOME
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?