SHAH v. TURNER III et al
PETER I. SHAH |
JOHN G. TURNER III, PATRICIA M. KIPNIS, ELLIOTT C. MCGRAW, KEVIN W. BARRETT, BAILY AND GLASSER LLP, CHRISTOPHER A. ABBATE, RIVERSTONE CREDIT PARTNERS, MAPLE ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC and VITAL ENERGY INC |
3:2024cv05988 |
May 10, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Tonianne J Bongiovanni |
Robert Kirsch |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CHRISTOPHER A. ABBATE, BAILY AND GLASSER LLP, KEVIN W. BARRETT, PATRICIA M. KIPNIS, MAPLE ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC, ELLIOTT C. MCGRAW, RIVERSTONE CREDIT PARTNERS, JOHN G. TURNER III, VITAL ENERGY INC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (kht) |
Filing 4 Clerk's Letter: Complaint not accompanied by the filing fee or application to proceed in forma pauperis. (kht) |
Filing 3 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (kht) |
Filing 2 Consent & Registration Form to Receive Documents Electronically by PETER I. SHAH (Received via Help Desk)(kht) |
Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibits)(Received via Help Desk)(kht) |
Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number TRE138495 (kht) |
COMPLAINT filed. See docket entry #1 .(kht) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.