PATEL, M.D. v. OPTUM MEDICAL CARE OF NEW JERSEY, P.C. et al
| AARTI PATEL, M.D. |
| OPTUM MEDICAL CARE OF NEW JERSEY, P.C. and MAHESH TEKRIWAL, M.D. |
| 3:2024cv06133 |
| May 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Robert Kirsch |
| Rukhsanah L Singh |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to OPTUM MEDICAL CARE OF NEW JERSEY, P.C., MAHESH TEKRIWAL, M.D.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (kht) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against OPTUM MEDICAL CARE OF NEW JERSEY, P.C., MAHESH TEKRIWAL, M.D. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15366321) with JURY DEMAND, filed by AARTI PATEL, M.D.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons TEKRIWAL, MD, #3 Summons OPTUM MEDICAL)(KEOSKEY, ALEX) |
| Judge Robert Kirsch and Magistrate Judge Rukhsanah L. Singh added. (kht) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The #1 Complaint submitted by Alex Keosky on 5/14/2024 appears to have address information that does not match the court's records for this case. Please refer to the court's website at www.njd.uscourts.gov for information and instructions on maintaining your account. (kht) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
