DAVIS v. HARRIS et al
| REGINAL LEE DAVIS |
| J.D. VANCE, KAMALA HARRIS, TIM WALZ, INDIANS COLONIES, OWNERS, PRESIDENTS, YANQUIS, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and DONALD TRUMP |
| 3:2024cv08921 |
| August 30, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Tonianne J Bongiovanni |
| Georgette Castner |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Proposed Order to show cause by REGINAL LEE DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(jal, ) |
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM ORDER directing the Clerk to Administratively close this matter; Plaintiff may submit a completed IFP application within 30 days of this order. Signed by Judge Georgette Castner on 10/11/2024. (jal, )
|
| Filing 4 Submission received by REGINAL LEE DAVIS (kht) |
| Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni added. Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill no longer assigned to case. (jjc, ) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (sms2, n.m.) |
|
Filing 3
TEXT ORDER REALLOCATING AND REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Georgette Castner for all further proceedings. Judge Edward S. Kiel no longer assigned to case. So Ordered by Chief Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 8/30/2024. (dmw, N.M.)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint Received. No IFP/FF Received. (sms2, n.m.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
