v. PERLMAN
| JEFFREY L. PERLMAN |
| 8:2018cv14073 |
| September 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 Copy of Order D-99-17 from the Supreme Court of New Jersey suspending JEFFREY L. PERLMAN from the practice of law for a period of one year, effective August 3, 2018, and until the further Order of that Court, and it is further ORDERED that prior to reinstatement to practice law, JEFFREY L. PERLMAN shall provide proof of his fitness to practice, as attested to by a mental health professional approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics, etc. (dc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: v. PERLMAN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: JEFFREY L. PERLMAN | |
| Represented By: | JEFFREY L. PERLMAN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
