v. BOTTON
Respondent: MICHAEL BOTTON
Case Number: 8:2021cv20469
Filed: December 14, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Freda L Wolfson
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER OF DISBARMENT, ORDERED, pursuant to L. Civ. R. 104.1(c), that MICHAEL BOTTON is hereby restrained and enjoined from practicing law before this Court during such time that he remains disbarred by the Supreme Court of New Jersey and until further order of this Court. Signed by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 1/10/2022. (dc, )
January 10, 2022 ***Miscellaneous Civil Case Terminated. (dc, )
December 14, 2021 Filing 1 Copy of Order D-33-21 from the Supreme Court of New Jersey, ORDERED that MICHAEL BOTTON is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further ORDERED that respondent's name be stricken from the role of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law. (dc, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: v. BOTTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MICHAEL BOTTON
Represented By: MICHAEL BOTTON
Represented By: JOHN MCGILL, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?