Cruz v. The Government of the State of New Mexico et al
| Lukis J Cruz |
| The Government of the State of New Mexico, Susana Martinez and FNU LNU |
| 1:2018cv00204 |
| March 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Albuquerque Office |
| Santa Fe |
| William P. Johnson |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson DENYING 25 Plaintiff's Motion for Restitution and ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why filing restrictions should not be imposed. Show Cause Response due by 4/13/2020. (mag)
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson DENYING 11 Plaintiff's Surrender of Sovereign Immunity by New Mexico and DENYING 21 Motion for Default Judgment. (mag)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson DENYING 8 Motion to Reassign Case and dismissing case without prejudice. (mag)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson GRANTING 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; DENYING 4 Plaintiff's Motion for Notice of Judgement and DISMISSING 1 Plaintiffs Civil Rights Complaint. Plaintiff may, within 21 days of entry of this Order, file an amended complaint for those claims that have been dismissed without prejudice. (mag)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
