Cases 1 - 10 of 1,193
Salazar v. LNU 5:23-CV-221
as 5:2023cv00221
Petitioner:
Ryan C. Salazar
Respondent:
FNU LNU 5:23-CV-221
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Fiorito v. LNU
as 5:2023cv00834
Petitioner:
Michael Fiorito
Respondent:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Adams v. LNU et al
as 5:2023cv00833
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Adams
Defendant:
FNU LNU and Turnkey Health Clinic LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Volante v. LNU
as 1:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Caley Volante
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacDonald v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv00777
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antonio MacDonald
Defendant:
Vicki Allen, Patrick Templin, Jesus Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Henderson County Det. et al
as 1:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Tony Michael Patterson
Defendant:
Henderson County Det., Dakota Wolfe, FNU Staggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Charles Young
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, FNU LNU 5:23-CV-190-H-1 and FNU LNU 5:23-CV-190-H-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Johnstone et al
as 5:2023cv03190
Plaintiff:
Freddie L. Williams
Defendant:
Jared Johnstone and (fnu) (lnu)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zurovetz v. Collier et al
as 5:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Todd Micheal Zurovetz
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Jayton D. Straughen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. US
as 23-6729
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FNU LNU, United States Department of Justice Director, FNU LNU, Director of the Administrative Office for the U.S. Courts and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
