Pratt v. Franco et al
| Jacob R Pratt |
| German Franco, David Jackson, FNU LNU and John Doe |
| 1:2018cv00524 |
| June 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Albuquerque Office |
| Santa Fe |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| Martha Vazquez |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Martha Vazquez DISMISSING 19 Amended Complaint. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the remaining claims asserted in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Prisoner's Civil Rights Complaint (Doc. 19 ) are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to comply with the Court's Order to Show Cause (Doc. 52 ) and failure to prosecute this action. (gr)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER ADOPTING 50 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by District Judge Martha Vazquez; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING AS MOOT IN PART 46 Motion for Summary Judgment. See order for specifics. (gr)
|
|
Filing
50
MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. Objections to Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition due by 12/8/2021. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (kmt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
