Pruitt v. Van Soelen et al
| Randall Pruitt |
| State of New Mexico, Fred Van Soelen and FNU LNU |
| 1:2019cv00442 |
| May 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kenneth J Gonzales |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Amend by Randall Pruitt. (jn) |
| Filing 8 CM/ECF PRO SE NOTIFICATION FORM by Randall Pruitt (jjs) |
| Filing 7 Letter by Randall Pruitt (jjs) |
| Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 25.00, receipt number ALB043629 (ln)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 5
Order Granting Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b) and to Make Payments or Show Cause by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. (tkl)
|
| District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales and Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa assigned. (mnb) |
| Filing 4 CM/ECF Pro Se Notification Form by Randall Pruitt electing to receive notification via postal mail. (mnb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Randall Pruitt. (mnb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Randall Pruitt. (mnb) |
| Filing 1 1983 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against FNU LNU, State of New Mexico, Fred Van Soelen, filed by Randall Pruitt. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(mnb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
