Dangim v. APD et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Scott Dangim
Defendant: APD, Isleta Casino and CDC
Case Number: 1:2023cv00131
Filed: February 10, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: Laura Fashing
Referring Judge: Kea W Riggs
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 FINAL JUDGMENT by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), and consistent with the #8 Order of Dismissal filed March 16, 2023, this civil action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (ve)
March 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF DISMISSAL by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. Plaintiff's #1 Civil Rights Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is DENIED AS MOOT. The Court will enter a separate judgment disposing of this civil case. (ve)
March 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE - Request Trial by Jury by Christopher Scott Dangim. (cmm)
March 10, 2023 Opinion or Order United States District Judge Kea W. Riggs assigned. (jg)
February 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE by Christopher Scott Dangim (dr)
February 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER to Cure Deficiencies by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing. Cure Deficiencies by 3/6/2023. The CLERK OF COURT shall send to Plaintiff the form "Civil Rights Complaint Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983" and the form "Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs (Long Form)." (ccp)
February 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing has been assigned for a 28 U.S.C. 1915 review. (jg)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
February 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CMECF PRO SE NOTIFICATION FORM electing to receive notification via postal mail by Christopher Scott Dangim (jg)
February 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Scott Dangim. (jg)
February 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against APD, CDC, Isleta Casino, filed by Christopher Scott Dangim. (jg)
February 10, 2023 Opinion or Order United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing assigned. (jg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dangim v. APD et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Scott Dangim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: APD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Isleta Casino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CDC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?