Sandoval v. City of Clovis et al
Joseph F. Sandoval |
FNU Chandler, NMDOC, City of Clovis and Probation and Parole |
2:2020cv00248 |
March 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Carmen E Garza |
William P Johnson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Plaintiff. (cmm) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address by Joseph F. Sandoval (meq) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #3 & #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. The Clerk's office is directed to provide Plaintiff with two copies of this Order. Plaintiff must make his initial payment of $13.46 no later than 5/25/20. (ag) |
Filing 5 FINANCIAL ENTRY by Joseph F. Sandoval (meq) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joseph F. Sandoval. (meq) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joseph F. Sandoval. (meq) |
Filing 2 ORDER to Cure Defects and Directing Clerk to Send Plaintiff a Form Motion to Proceed IFP by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. Defects must be cured within thirty days of entry of this Order. (ag) |
Filing 1 1983 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Joseph F. Sandoval. (ln) |
United States Chief District Judge William P. Johnson and United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza assigned. (ln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.