Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Apodaca et al v. Gallegos et al
as 2:2024cv01077
Defendant:
FNU Cox/Cook, Megan Palla, Helen Casaus and others
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Ben Albert, Dr Victor Andrew Apodaca, Sr and Daniel Julian Acosta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
T. V. S. v. City of Clovis et al
as 1:2024cv00987
Plaintiff:
T. V. S.
Defendant:
Officer Hannah Romias and City of Clovis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sandoval v. City of Clovis et al
as 1:2024cv00735
Defendant:
Nickolas Jackson, City of Clovis, Drew Tatum and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Novoa et al
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Candace Smith
Defendant:
Dannette Novoa, Triple A Insurance, City of Clovis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Smith v. Novoa et al
as 1:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Candace Smith
Defendant:
Dannette Novoa, Triple A Insurance and The City of Clovis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hannah v. City of Clovis et al
as 1:2024at00134
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hannah
Defendant:
City of Clovis, P. Garcia, S O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hannah v. City of Clovis et al
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hannah
Defendant:
City of Clovis, P. Garcia and S O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Perry v. C.C.A.D.C. et al
as 2:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Steve Perry
Defendant:
C.C.A.D.C. and City of Clovis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keohavang v. City of Clovis
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Leuthvilay Keohavang
Defendant:
City of Clovis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Plains Hospital et al
as 2:2023cv00867
Plaintiff:
Jason W Jones
Defendant:
Plains Hospital, City of Clovis and FNU Tatom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
