Hart v. Foot Locker Corporation
| Myrtis Paulo Hart |
| Foot Locker Corporation, Dick Johnson, Rick Johnson, FBI, FCC and USA |
| 2:2021cv01135 |
| November 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Margaret I Strickland |
| Gregory B Wormuth |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Myrtis Paulo Hart. Related document: #1 and #6 Complaint filed by Myrtis Paulo Hart. (bc)
|
|
Filing 6
COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS filed by Myrtis Paulo Hart. (bc)
|
|
Filing 5
Mail sent to Myrtis Paulo Hart Returned as Undeliverable re #1 Complaint, #2 Appendix/Supplement. Mail was resent to new address at Central NM Correctional Facilty (jjs)
|
|
Filing 4
Mail sent to Myrtis Paulo Hart Returned as Undeliverable re #3 Order to Cure Defects. (jjs)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER to Cure Defects by Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth. Cure Defects by 1/3/2022. (ceo)
|
|
United States District Judge Margaret I. Strickland and United States Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth assigned. (dr)
|
|
Filing 2
APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENT re #1 Complaint by Myrtis Paulo Hart (dr)
|
|
Filing 1
1983 PRISONER'S CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Foot Locker Corporation, filed by Myrtis Paulo Hart. (dr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
