Tafoya v. City of Clovis et al
| Tatiana Tafoya |
| City of Clovis, Antonio Orozco, Roman Romero, Doug Ford, Jordan Lee Riddle and Louis T. Riddle |
| 2:2022cv00492 |
| July 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Gregory J Fouratt |
| William P Johnson |
| Stephan M Vidmar |
| Personal Injury: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Briefing Complete by City of Clovis re #10 Partial MOTION to Dismiss filed by City of Clovis (Evans, Bryan) |
| Filing 24 REPLY to Response to Motion re #10 Partial MOTION to Dismiss filed by City of Clovis. (Evans, Bryan) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE REGARDING DOCUMENT ENTRIES: Because this case has been reassigned to a district judge, please be advised that any documents filed by the parties under Rule 73(b) have been permanently removed from the docket. Document(s) removed: Nos. 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (kg) |
| Filing 22 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Louis T. Riddle. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Tatiana Tafoya.(Soto Hall, Denise) |
| Filing 21 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Louis T. Riddle (Soto Hall, Denise) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Denise Suzanne Soto Hall on behalf of Louis T. Riddle (Soto Hall, Denise) |
| Filing 19 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to Chief United States District Judge William P. Johnson as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
| Filing 18 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by City of Clovis for Offer of Judgment (Evans, Bryan) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 Partial MOTION to Dismiss by City of Clovis Defendants filed by Tatiana Tafoya. (Carpenter, Frances) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF CONSENT SUBMISSION DEADLINE by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt. In light of the pending dispositive motion, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that this matter will be reassigned to a district judge as presiding judge if written consents from all parties have not been filed by August 22, 2022. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (gbg)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 10 Partial MOTION to Dismiss by City of Clovis. (Evans, Bryan) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tatiana Tafoya. Roman Romero served on 7/12/2022, answer due 8/2/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Carpenter, Frances) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tatiana Tafoya. Jordan Lee Riddle served on 7/12/2022, answer due 8/2/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Carpenter, Frances) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tatiana Tafoya. Doug Ford served on 7/12/2022, answer due 8/2/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Carpenter, Frances) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tatiana Tafoya. Louis T. Riddle served on 7/15/2022, answer due 8/5/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Carpenter, Frances) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tatiana Tafoya. City of Clovis served on 7/11/2022, answer due 8/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Carpenter, Frances) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tatiana Tafoya. Antonio Orozco served on 7/11/2022, answer due 8/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Carpenter, Frances) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-8352983 re #1 Complaint filed by Tatiana Tafoya (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Carpenter, Frances) |
| Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (dr) |
| Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
| Filing 2 APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENT re #1 Complaint by Tatiana Tafoya (Carpenter, Frances) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Damages against All Defendants ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Tatiana Tafoya. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Carpenter, Frances) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt and United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar assigned. (dr) |
| Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 1 (Albuquerque) to 2 (Las Cruces). (dr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
