Curtis & Associates, P.C. et al v. The Law Offices of David M. Bushman, Esq. et al
| Curtis & Associates, P.C. and W. Robert Curtis, Sc.D., J.D. |
| The Law Offices of David M. Bushman, Esq., David M. Bushman, David M. Bushman, Esq., Janet Callaghan, Eileen Degregorio, Stevi Brooks Nichols, Jeffrey Levitt, Esq., Jeffrey Levitt, Herbert Monte Levy, Esq., Law Offices of Herbert Monte Levy, Esq., John Doe, Esq., Law Offices of John Doe, Esq., Jane Doe, Esq. and Law Offices of Jane Doe, Esq. |
| 1:2009cv00890 |
| March 3, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization Office |
| Kings |
| Kiyo A. Matsumoto |
| Ramon E. Reyes |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Fed. Question |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
202
ORDER granting in part 194 , 195 , 196 , 197 , 199 , and 200 , Motions for Bond. For the reasons set forth in the attached memorandum and order, defendants' motions to require plaintiffs' posting of an appeal bond are granted in part . Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that no later than March 25, 2011, together, plaintiffs post an appeal bond with the Clerk of the Court in the amount of $5,000 to cover the taxable costs of appeal. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to mail a copy of this memorandum and order to pro se defendant Nichols. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 3/9/2011. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 3/9/2011. (Ginns, Laura)
|
|
Filing
191
MEMORANDUM & ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached memorandum and order: (1) All defendants' motions to dismiss the federal RICO causes of action are granted and such claims are dismissed in their entirety and with prejudice. The co urt declines to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs' state law claims which are dismissed without prejudice. (2) Plaintiffs' motion to amend or supplement the complaint is denied as futile. (3) Plaintiffs' separate motions to disqualify Levitt and Levy as counsel are both denied as moot. (4) The motion for sanctions by the Levitt defendants and defendant Turansky is denied, and the court further declines to sua sponte issue sanctions. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment in favor of defendants, to mail a copy of this memorandum and order to pro se defendant Nichols, and to close this case. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 12/15/2010. (Ginns, Laura)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER denying 27 Motion for Reconsideration. C/M by Chambers. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 5/20/2009. (Bodah, Daniel)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
